<![CDATA[Should I buy?]]>I need some new sunglasses and was looking at designing my own with Oakley.

What you think?

or…

Make me some here. http://oakley.co.uk/custom/flakjacket 🙂

]]>http://localhost:4567/topic/2436/should-i-buyRSS for NodeSat, 13 Jun 2026 18:40:06 GMTTue, 16 Mar 2010 14:54:32 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Should I buy? on Wed, 17 Mar 2010 15:35:33 GMT]]>@LoVeRSaMa:

SDR has reverse Michel Jackson syndrom tbh, hes like a 50 year old inside of a childs body.. infact scrach reverse.

Moo

]]>http://localhost:4567/post/28447http://localhost:4567/post/28447Wed, 17 Mar 2010 15:35:33 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Should I buy? on Wed, 17 Mar 2010 14:42:14 GMT]]>I'm not suprised you didnt ask for moar.
I'm suprised they didnt serve you with gruel.

]]>http://localhost:4567/post/28436http://localhost:4567/post/28436Wed, 17 Mar 2010 14:42:14 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Should I buy? on Wed, 17 Mar 2010 13:09:36 GMT]]>@deadpony-:

what sort of ghetto dinner party is that?
Jam on bread with a wh-opping great big glass of water.

The only other person those glasses could suit are a 40 year old balding english man in spain.

Depends what your going for Scott.

Its Joshes house ^_^
Ironically I did ask for Moar.

SDR has reverse Michel Jackson syndrom tbh, hes like a 50 year old inside of a childs body.. infact scrach reverse.

@SDR:

Nice toilet roll. :rolleyes:

Black..!

]]>http://localhost:4567/post/28432http://localhost:4567/post/28432Wed, 17 Mar 2010 13:09:36 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Should I buy? on Wed, 17 Mar 2010 12:58:41 GMT]]>@SDR:

Nice toilet roll. :rolleyes:

You're keeping your eyes open for such details 😄

]]>http://localhost:4567/post/28429http://localhost:4567/post/28429Wed, 17 Mar 2010 12:58:41 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Should I buy? on Wed, 17 Mar 2010 12:32:20 GMT]]>@LoVeRSaMa:

Seriously, I had a flame T-Shirt when I was 10, infact I even had the Flame Hat..

Lol13yearsold

Nice toilet roll. :rolleyes:

]]>http://localhost:4567/post/28421http://localhost:4567/post/28421Wed, 17 Mar 2010 12:32:20 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Should I buy? on Wed, 17 Mar 2010 12:25:09 GMT]]>what sort of ghetto dinner party is that?
Jam on bread with a wh-opping great big glass of water.

The only other person those glasses could suit are a 40 year old balding english man in spain.

Depends what your going for Scott.

]]>http://localhost:4567/post/28415http://localhost:4567/post/28415Wed, 17 Mar 2010 12:25:09 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Should I buy? on Wed, 17 Mar 2010 09:24:51 GMT]]>Ohh….so cute! 😄

]]>http://localhost:4567/post/28407http://localhost:4567/post/28407Wed, 17 Mar 2010 09:24:51 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Should I buy? on Wed, 17 Mar 2010 08:52:27 GMT]]>@deadpony-:

They're so gay scott.

They look like ones a ten year old would find cool.

You may aswell buy a button up shirt with flames and a dragon on from victoria market.

Get yourself a pair of classic Ray Bans and get laid.

Seriously, I had a flame T-Shirt when I was 10, infact I even had the Flame Hat..

Lol13yearsold

]]>http://localhost:4567/post/28405http://localhost:4567/post/28405Wed, 17 Mar 2010 08:52:27 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Should I buy? on Wed, 17 Mar 2010 02:38:30 GMT]]>@SDR:

I need some new sunglasses and was looking at designing my own with Oakley.

What you think?

or…

Make me some here. http://oakley.co.uk/custom/flakjacket 🙂

They're so gay scott.

They look like ones a ten year old would find cool.

You may aswell buy a button up shirt with flames and a dragon on from victoria market.

Get yourself a pair of classic Ray Bans and get laid.

]]>http://localhost:4567/post/28396http://localhost:4567/post/28396Wed, 17 Mar 2010 02:38:30 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Should I buy? on Wed, 17 Mar 2010 00:19:31 GMT]]>@BUBBA_BDS:

Stick with those, unless you are really into hunting a fishing.

Obviously I'm into fishing…but I'm not going to waste money on an expensive pair of glasses when $12 ones do the exact same thing.

]]>http://localhost:4567/post/28391http://localhost:4567/post/28391Wed, 17 Mar 2010 00:19:31 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Should I buy? on Tue, 16 Mar 2010 23:53:36 GMT]]>@Bronco:

I have some. The ones with the blue reflective lenses. They're made to see into the water.

Stick with those, unless you are really into hunting a fishing.

]]>http://localhost:4567/post/28390http://localhost:4567/post/28390Tue, 16 Mar 2010 23:53:36 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Should I buy? on Tue, 16 Mar 2010 23:45:20 GMT]]>@BUBBA_BDS:

You need fisherman glasses… as i have seen in your facebook picture holding a fish

I have some. The ones with the blue reflective lenses. They're made to see into the water.

]]>http://localhost:4567/post/28389http://localhost:4567/post/28389Tue, 16 Mar 2010 23:45:20 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Should I buy? on Tue, 16 Mar 2010 23:42:03 GMT]]>@Bronco:

It costs 140£ to be gay? Didn't know that…queers must be rich.

These are more my style.

http://www.gunnars.com/remix/catalyst_groove_grey_outdoors.php

You need fisherman glasses… as i have seen in your facebook picture holding a fish

]]>http://localhost:4567/post/28388http://localhost:4567/post/28388Tue, 16 Mar 2010 23:42:03 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Should I buy? on Tue, 16 Mar 2010 23:35:54 GMT]]>@tinpixel:

I have A £250 pair of Oliver Peoples 'Benedict' aviators - they look gay as on their own (blue gradient, photochromatic lenses, silver frames) - but on my face they look awesomely cool and understated. Tried well over 100 pairs over many years to find 'the ones' though (didn't buy these just because they were expensive) - suggest you do the same as it's a lot of money to spend on a mistake.

If you like them though, go for it. Shouldn't matter what we think.

I have sat on my $10 aviators about 4 times, dropped them on concrete, dropped them in a lake and retrieved them, bent them out of wearable shape a number of times, and the still fit and work great. I just bend them back into a shape that will stay on my face and continue on. Can't ask for anything better.

]]>http://localhost:4567/post/28387http://localhost:4567/post/28387Tue, 16 Mar 2010 23:35:54 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Should I buy? on Tue, 16 Mar 2010 23:28:18 GMT]]>I have A £250 pair of Oliver Peoples 'Benedict' aviators - they look gay as on their own (blue gradient, photochromatic lenses, silver frames) - but on my face they look awesomely cool and understated. Tried well over 100 pairs over many years to find 'the ones' though (didn't buy these just because they were expensive) - suggest you do the same as it's a lot of money to spend on a mistake.

If you like them though, go for it. Shouldn't matter what we think.

]]>http://localhost:4567/post/28386http://localhost:4567/post/28386Tue, 16 Mar 2010 23:28:18 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Should I buy? on Tue, 16 Mar 2010 19:17:37 GMT]]>@SDR:

Not bad, but meh. 🙂

I'm a simple guy. I am wearing a $10 pair of knock-off Aviators atm. 😄

(You have probably seen them on my Facebook…)

]]>http://localhost:4567/post/28362http://localhost:4567/post/28362Tue, 16 Mar 2010 19:17:37 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Should I buy? on Tue, 16 Mar 2010 19:12:46 GMT]]>@SDR:

They look fucking terrible!

I'm a designer and know alot about colour, clearly you don't. 😛

no they fit my cross-country ski 😄

]]>http://localhost:4567/post/28359http://localhost:4567/post/28359Tue, 16 Mar 2010 19:12:46 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Should I buy? on Tue, 16 Mar 2010 19:01:45 GMT]]>@Bronco:

It costs 140£ to be gay? Didn't know that…queers must be rich.

These are more my style.

http://www.gunnars.com/remix/catalyst_groove_grey_outdoors.php

Not bad, but meh. 🙂

]]>http://localhost:4567/post/28356http://localhost:4567/post/28356Tue, 16 Mar 2010 19:01:45 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Should I buy? on Tue, 16 Mar 2010 19:00:24 GMT]]>@GhosT^:

These are 140£ 🙂

They look fucking terrible!

I'm a designer and know alot about colour, clearly you don't. 😛

]]>http://localhost:4567/post/28354http://localhost:4567/post/28354Tue, 16 Mar 2010 19:00:24 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Should I buy? on Tue, 16 Mar 2010 18:56:58 GMT]]>@GhosT^:

These are 140£ 🙂

It costs 140£ to be gay? Didn't know that…queers must be rich.

These are more my style.

http://www.gunnars.com/remix/catalyst_groove_grey_outdoors.php

]]>http://localhost:4567/post/28353http://localhost:4567/post/28353Tue, 16 Mar 2010 18:56:58 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Should I buy? on Tue, 16 Mar 2010 18:24:48 GMT]]>they was really cool. if i had money, i would probably buy them 😛

sorry scott. but you are beaten

]]>http://localhost:4567/post/28347http://localhost:4567/post/28347Tue, 16 Mar 2010 18:24:48 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Should I buy? on Tue, 16 Mar 2010 18:17:43 GMT]]>

These are 140£ 🙂

]]>http://localhost:4567/post/28346http://localhost:4567/post/28346Tue, 16 Mar 2010 18:17:43 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Should I buy? on Tue, 16 Mar 2010 18:15:49 GMT]]>@SDR:

They are cool, but I already have £80 Sony headphones. 😄

But it ruins the fact that some of us like to listen to music without sunglasses on…

]]>http://localhost:4567/post/28345http://localhost:4567/post/28345Tue, 16 Mar 2010 18:15:49 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Should I buy? on Tue, 16 Mar 2010 18:02:15 GMT]]>@BUBBA_BDS:

Buy oakley sunglasses with headphones

@Bronco:

No.

They are cool, but I already have £80 Sony headphones. 😄

]]>http://localhost:4567/post/28339http://localhost:4567/post/28339Tue, 16 Mar 2010 18:02:15 GMT