<![CDATA[Call of Duty: Black Ops website launches]]>The official web site for Call of Duty: Black Ops has launched, revealing the release date for the next Call of Duty game.

More…

]]>http://localhost:4567/topic/2684/call-of-duty-black-ops-website-launchesRSS for NodeSat, 13 Jun 2026 18:06:39 GMTSun, 02 May 2010 06:29:52 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Call of Duty: Black Ops website launches on Sun, 09 May 2010 01:21:08 GMT]]>not gonna bother with this game. after CoD 4, CoD went down the drain.

]]>http://localhost:4567/post/29614http://localhost:4567/post/29614Sun, 09 May 2010 01:21:08 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Call of Duty: Black Ops website launches on Sat, 08 May 2010 23:07:00 GMT]]>@GhosT^:

I still see people playing WaW.. I see them all the time when im on Steam 🙂
I've seen many more on PS3 that still play WaW.. So I don't think that everyone quit playing it when MW2 came out 😛

😄 i meant in SinS 😄 i played it for some weeks ago 😄

]]>http://localhost:4567/post/29613http://localhost:4567/post/29613Sat, 08 May 2010 23:07:00 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Call of Duty: Black Ops website launches on Sat, 08 May 2010 22:11:43 GMT]]>@GhosT^:

I still see people playing WaW.. I see them all the time when im on Steam 🙂
I've seen many more on PS3 that still play WaW.. So I don't think that everyone quit playing it when MW2 came out 😛

lol, I went back to cod4 a long time before mw2 came out 🙂

]]>http://localhost:4567/post/29612http://localhost:4567/post/29612Sat, 08 May 2010 22:11:43 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Call of Duty: Black Ops website launches on Sat, 08 May 2010 21:28:12 GMT]]>@Es0055:

blahblah blah. it a old game. just let it pas. no one is playing it 😛

I still see people playing WaW.. I see them all the time when im on Steam 🙂
I've seen many more on PS3 that still play WaW.. So I don't think that everyone quit playing it when MW2 came out 😛

]]>http://localhost:4567/post/29611http://localhost:4567/post/29611Sat, 08 May 2010 21:28:12 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Call of Duty: Black Ops website launches on Sat, 08 May 2010 20:10:13 GMT]]>@Bronco:

Huge maps, tanks, lousy hit registration, terrible weapons, the list goes on…

battlefield bc2 = huge maps
battlefield bb2 = tanks
mw2= the other day i was already around a corner and got shot dead. watched the replay kill cam he missed by a mile i was around the corner already on his screen too not lag!
weapons= ww2 guns of that era
and idk about on and on but the tanks were balanced well imo, and gameplay was still fast paced despite map size. just saying. ohh and zombies yes i prefer zombies over spec ops any day!!!!!!!

]]>http://localhost:4567/post/29609http://localhost:4567/post/29609Sat, 08 May 2010 20:10:13 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Call of Duty: Black Ops website launches on Thu, 06 May 2010 21:16:03 GMT]]>@Bronco:

I quit playing it after the Xbox beta…

i played it online for fist time for some days ago. 😛

]]>http://localhost:4567/post/29593http://localhost:4567/post/29593Thu, 06 May 2010 21:16:03 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Call of Duty: Black Ops website launches on Thu, 06 May 2010 21:10:59 GMT]]>@Bronco:

Call of Duty = Awesome
Call of Duty 2 = Awesome
Call of Duty 3 = FAIL
Call of Duty 4 = Awesome
Call of Duty: World at War = FAIL
Modern Warfare 2 = Pretty awesome

What do both of the failed COD games have in common?

World At War was fun because it actually had gore… but dont like the WW2 MW2 would have been cooler if they had the gore... but By the looks of the trailer, it looks like it takes place in Vietnam.. not the vietnam war.

]]>http://localhost:4567/post/29591http://localhost:4567/post/29591Thu, 06 May 2010 21:10:59 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Call of Duty: Black Ops website launches on Thu, 06 May 2010 21:00:34 GMT]]>@Es0055:

blahblah blah. it a old game. just let it pas. no one is playing it 😛

I quit playing it after the Xbox beta…

]]>http://localhost:4567/post/29590http://localhost:4567/post/29590Thu, 06 May 2010 21:00:34 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Call of Duty: Black Ops website launches on Thu, 06 May 2010 20:56:13 GMT]]>blahblah blah. it a old game. just let it pas. no one is playing it 😛

]]>http://localhost:4567/post/29589http://localhost:4567/post/29589Thu, 06 May 2010 20:56:13 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Call of Duty: Black Ops website launches on Thu, 06 May 2010 20:53:39 GMT]]>@Bronco:

Huge maps, tanks, lousy hit registration, terrible weapons, the list goes on…

Yeah, it's not that it's a ww2-game…I can like that!
But, what bronco said explains a lot

and the sprinting is terrible there...

]]>http://localhost:4567/post/29588http://localhost:4567/post/29588Thu, 06 May 2010 20:53:39 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Call of Duty: Black Ops website launches on Thu, 06 May 2010 20:53:37 GMT]]>@Bronco:

Huge maps, tanks, lousy hit registration, terrible weapons, the list goes on…

huge map? someone, but there was small maps to. variation!! that's good. 😉 tanks.. agree with you. bad because there isn't cod style. but they tried to make something new in the game. and the weapons is not bad, they are old. they are great made, and they wasn't better on that time 😉
you don't like WaW because it from ww2, like butzke say 🙂 and i can live with that. everyone has there own decision. but don't say the game was bad. just say you didn't like it because of the time epoch. they have made the game after the condition in ww2 🙂

]]>http://localhost:4567/post/29587http://localhost:4567/post/29587Thu, 06 May 2010 20:53:37 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Call of Duty: Black Ops website launches on Thu, 06 May 2010 20:31:54 GMT]]>Huge maps, tanks, lousy hit registration, terrible weapons, the list goes on…

]]>http://localhost:4567/post/29585http://localhost:4567/post/29585Thu, 06 May 2010 20:31:54 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Call of Duty: Black Ops website launches on Thu, 06 May 2010 19:45:56 GMT]]>tell me why besides iw didn't make it. mw2=noob tubes and dual shotgun fags. what develeper alows that! dont get me wrong i like mw2 but there are still many errors! if you say that you dont like waw because you are sick of ww2 games than thats fine. however its not that the game sucked its that you don't like the time period the game takes place in. which is personal preference. i can live with that, but tell me what sucked about it?

]]>http://localhost:4567/post/29582http://localhost:4567/post/29582Thu, 06 May 2010 19:45:56 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Call of Duty: Black Ops website launches on Thu, 06 May 2010 11:08:23 GMT]]>@Countach92:

It does…

WaW sucked donkey ballz

]]>http://localhost:4567/post/29581http://localhost:4567/post/29581Thu, 06 May 2010 11:08:23 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Call of Duty: Black Ops website launches on Thu, 06 May 2010 09:15:08 GMT]]>@JAWisMyName:

agreed, but WaW don't suck balls…

It does…

]]>http://localhost:4567/post/29579http://localhost:4567/post/29579Thu, 06 May 2010 09:15:08 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Call of Duty: Black Ops website launches on Thu, 06 May 2010 07:17:24 GMT]]>@Bronco:

I honestly don't care who developed what. Modern Warfare 2 is a far superior game to World at War in terms of engine and programming. Enough said.

agreed, but WaW don't suck balls…

]]>http://localhost:4567/post/29577http://localhost:4567/post/29577Thu, 06 May 2010 07:17:24 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Call of Duty: Black Ops website launches on Thu, 06 May 2010 03:10:54 GMT]]>@Buttzke:

lol all i see is people complaining about mw2. but yet u all still say it is good because of who developed it. and yet a solid fps like waw sucks for no other reason than who developed it. ignore the developer look at the game and gameplay. make your own decisions!

I honestly don't care who developed what. Modern Warfare 2 is a far superior game to World at War in terms of engine and programming. Enough said.

]]>http://localhost:4567/post/29576http://localhost:4567/post/29576Thu, 06 May 2010 03:10:54 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Call of Duty: Black Ops website launches on Wed, 05 May 2010 22:54:03 GMT]]>Its not like IW is good anymore anyway, most of the staff quit and has remade a group funded by EA

]]>http://localhost:4567/post/29575http://localhost:4567/post/29575Wed, 05 May 2010 22:54:03 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Call of Duty: Black Ops website launches on Wed, 05 May 2010 21:51:35 GMT]]>@Buttzke:

lol all i see is people complaining about mw2. but yet u all still say it is good because of who developed it. and yet a solid fps like waw sucks for no other reason than who developed it. ignore the developer look at the game and gameplay. make your own decisions!

thank you 🙂 finally a guy who understand 😄

]]>http://localhost:4567/post/29574http://localhost:4567/post/29574Wed, 05 May 2010 21:51:35 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Call of Duty: Black Ops website launches on Wed, 05 May 2010 20:30:40 GMT]]>lol all i see is people complaining about mw2. but yet u all still say it is good because of who developed it. and yet a solid fps like waw sucks for no other reason than who developed it. ignore the developer look at the game and gameplay. make your own decisions!

]]>http://localhost:4567/post/29573http://localhost:4567/post/29573Wed, 05 May 2010 20:30:40 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Call of Duty: Black Ops website launches on Tue, 04 May 2010 22:28:04 GMT]]>Agreed Treyarch suck at games.
How can u even joke that it might be the best fps to come out!!!

Halo Reach looks better than this… nough said!!!

]]>http://localhost:4567/post/29571http://localhost:4567/post/29571Tue, 04 May 2010 22:28:04 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Call of Duty: Black Ops website launches on Tue, 04 May 2010 20:48:22 GMT]]>Battlefield BC2 owns all!!!

Fact!!

😛

]]>http://localhost:4567/post/29566http://localhost:4567/post/29566Tue, 04 May 2010 20:48:22 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Call of Duty: Black Ops website launches on Tue, 04 May 2010 11:38:58 GMT]]>What makes you say that?
OK it was't great but it was playable

]]>http://localhost:4567/post/29552http://localhost:4567/post/29552Tue, 04 May 2010 11:38:58 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Call of Duty: Black Ops website launches on Tue, 04 May 2010 11:30:50 GMT]]>world at war sucked balls!

]]>http://localhost:4567/post/29551http://localhost:4567/post/29551Tue, 04 May 2010 11:30:50 GMT