Halo Reach?

[LoVeRSaMa]

@Nite:

the game is amazing and they took the best from each game and just combined them into one.

So they just remade Halo 1 and left it at that?

[Nite]

no because halo 1 didn't have online.

[Skittbiker]

we dont take kindly to your kind round her'.

[Gamerr-X]

@skittbiker:

we dont take kindly to your kind round her'.

**lol

But is it as good as MGS4…**

[Nite]

well considering all people play halo for is the multiplayer then its like a hundred times better because MGS4's multiplayer is terrible.

[BUBBA_BDS]

Yep.. i herd that the game sucked.

[Bronco]

Halo: Reach is great…so don't try and say it sucks without playing it yourself.

[Skittbiker]

Reach is alotta fun. the campaign was great, co-op campaign is fun as hell. all the new gameplay modes and gameplay modes they ported over from other halo versions are quite exciting. The multiplayer and competition aspect of the game has one of the best i've seen. practically the pioneer of matchmaking. They put it right there in front of you; If you want to play competitively(arena mode, which will be used for seasonal MLG playlists), or just for fun, which would most likely be played when you just want to have a good time or have a couple friends over and are playing on the same TV. It's a really well rounded game, as Dale said, they put all the famed features from previous halo games into Reach. I'm sorry, but COD and MGS cannot live up to the halo franchise.

ps: i'm not a fanboy.

[BUBBA_BDS]

I want an xbox soo bad… just to play 2 games on it. Americas Army 3 & Halo 1 2 3 Reach.... but im saving money to buy an RM250cc Suzuki dirtbike.

[Gamerr-X]

@Nite:

well considering all people play halo for is the multiplayer then its like a hundred times better because MGS4's multiplayer is terrible.

**Yet the single-player is downright amazing lol

But yeah, Reach did look pretty good, maybe I will play it one day, who knows.**

[LoVeRSaMa]

@Skittbiker:

but COD and MGS cannot live up to the halo franchise.

ps: i'm not a fanboy.

Ha.

In terms of story MGS blows Halo out of the water. (1998)
In terms of Multi-player COD blows Halo out of the water. (sales figures)

I have played all these games (bar halo reach, which I have yet to play)
Halo is fun, but not as good as Call of duty, and does not have me on the edge of my seat like MGS had.

@Nite:

well considering all people play halo for is the multiplayer then its like a hundred times better because MGS4's multiplayer is terrible.

It wasnt that bad, they decided not to become a generic shooter, MGS isn't re-nounded for its multi-player

[Gamerr-X]

Well said Nate, MGS' has gotten quite a few perfect reviews, scoring 100% a few times if I recall, getting a 10 on IGN and such; Not a game to knock at all lol

[Clowd]

the story is awesome and what a epic ending

and im so pro at multiplayer too!!

*burp

[LoVeRSaMa]

@Clowd:

im so pro at multiplayer too!!

Same, I have a screen shot of my Rank 13th in the world

Happy B-day for the other day btw Clowd!

[Orpel.UK]

ihave played all halo games bar reach.

i played halo 1 and thought it was amazing their is no denying that its was the reason the xbox console sold soo many copies.
Halo 2 almost as good but safe to say the original is always better in most cases and again with how it ended it was the reason the xbox360 sold so many copies cause every1 wanted to play halo 3.

I played halo 3 and noticed something nothing had change from the last 2 it was the same and that just bored me looked like they hadnt even tried to do anything.
Reach might be an amazing game but like nate said cant compare it to the likes of cod and mgs.

[Nite]

you are right except halo 2 wasnt a 360 game it was a normal xbox game.

[Dimmy]

Halo: Reach > COD even though you can't compare the two because Aliens > Other Countries' soldiers so bleh. There is no Sci-fi aspect to the COD series.