Call of Duty: Black Ops website launches
-
Call of Duty = Awesome
Call of Duty 2 = Awesome
Call of Duty 3 = FAIL
Call of Duty 4 = Awesome
Call of Duty: World at War = FAIL
Modern Warfare 2 = Pretty awesomeWhat do both of the failed COD games have in common?
Call of Duty = Awesome
Call of Duty 2 = Awesome
Call of Duty 3 = FAIL
Call of Duty 4 = Awesome
Call of Duty: World at War = FAIL
Modern Warfare 2 = Pretty awesomeWhat do both of the failed COD games have in common?
Let Es0055 guess

-
Call of Duty = Awesome
Call of Duty 2 = Awesome
Call of Duty 3 = FAIL
Call of Duty 4 = Awesome
Call of Duty: World at War = FAIL
Modern Warfare 2 = Pretty awesomeWhat do both of the failed COD games have in common?
Call of Duty = Awesome
Call of Duty 2 = Awesome
Call of Duty 3 = FAIL
Call of Duty 4 = Awesome
Call of Duty: World at War = FAIL
Modern Warfare 2 = Pretty awesomeWhat do both of the failed COD games have in common?
world at war was't that bad, MW and MW2 is way bether but still…
I have to agree with ES, black ops looks prity cool -
world at war sucked balls!
-
What makes you say that?
OK it was't great but it was playable -
Agreed Treyarch suck at games.
How can u even joke that it might be the best fps to come out!!!Halo Reach looks better than this… nough said!!!
lol all i see is people complaining about mw2. but yet u all still say it is good because of who developed it. and yet a solid fps like waw sucks for no other reason than who developed it. ignore the developer look at the game and gameplay. make your own decisions!
-
lol all i see is people complaining about mw2. but yet u all still say it is good because of who developed it. and yet a solid fps like waw sucks for no other reason than who developed it. ignore the developer look at the game and gameplay. make your own decisions!
lol all i see is people complaining about mw2. but yet u all still say it is good because of who developed it. and yet a solid fps like waw sucks for no other reason than who developed it. ignore the developer look at the game and gameplay. make your own decisions!
thank you
finally a guy who understand 
-
lol all i see is people complaining about mw2. but yet u all still say it is good because of who developed it. and yet a solid fps like waw sucks for no other reason than who developed it. ignore the developer look at the game and gameplay. make your own decisions!
lol all i see is people complaining about mw2. but yet u all still say it is good because of who developed it. and yet a solid fps like waw sucks for no other reason than who developed it. ignore the developer look at the game and gameplay. make your own decisions!
I honestly don't care who developed what. Modern Warfare 2 is a far superior game to World at War in terms of engine and programming. Enough said.
-
lol all i see is people complaining about mw2. but yet u all still say it is good because of who developed it. and yet a solid fps like waw sucks for no other reason than who developed it. ignore the developer look at the game and gameplay. make your own decisions!
I honestly don't care who developed what. Modern Warfare 2 is a far superior game to World at War in terms of engine and programming. Enough said.
I honestly don't care who developed what. Modern Warfare 2 is a far superior game to World at War in terms of engine and programming. Enough said.
agreed, but WaW don't suck balls…
-
I honestly don't care who developed what. Modern Warfare 2 is a far superior game to World at War in terms of engine and programming. Enough said.
agreed, but WaW don't suck balls…
-
-
tell me why besides iw didn't make it. mw2=noob tubes and dual shotgun fags. what develeper alows that! dont get me wrong i like mw2 but there are still many errors! if you say that you dont like waw because you are sick of ww2 games than thats fine. however its not that the game sucked its that you don't like the time period the game takes place in. which is personal preference. i can live with that, but tell me what sucked about it?
-
Huge maps, tanks, lousy hit registration, terrible weapons, the list goes on…
huge map? someone, but there was small maps to. variation!! that's good.
tanks.. agree with you. bad because there isn't cod style. but they tried to make something new in the game. and the weapons is not bad, they are old. they are great made, and they wasn't better on that time 
you don't like WaW because it from ww2, like butzke say
and i can live with that. everyone has there own decision. but don't say the game was bad. just say you didn't like it because of the time epoch. they have made the game after the condition in ww2 
-
Huge maps, tanks, lousy hit registration, terrible weapons, the list goes on…
Yeah, it's not that it's a ww2-game…I can like that!
But, what bronco said explains a lotand the sprinting is terrible there...
-
Call of Duty = Awesome
Call of Duty 2 = Awesome
Call of Duty 3 = FAIL
Call of Duty 4 = Awesome
Call of Duty: World at War = FAIL
Modern Warfare 2 = Pretty awesomeWhat do both of the failed COD games have in common?
Call of Duty = Awesome
Call of Duty 2 = Awesome
Call of Duty 3 = FAIL
Call of Duty 4 = Awesome
Call of Duty: World at War = FAIL
Modern Warfare 2 = Pretty awesomeWhat do both of the failed COD games have in common?
World At War was fun because it actually had gore… but dont like the WW2 MW2 would have been cooler if they had the gore... but By the looks of the trailer, it looks like it takes place in Vietnam.. not the vietnam war.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login













